There was also a drop of 7% for Group A offenses and a 21.8% drop in total arrests in the city. 9. Norfolk. Norfolk, the third most populous city in Virginia, ranks 9 th in the most dangerous cities in the state. Any person visiting Norfolk must be aware of the crime rate in this city. Military.com continues to outline updates for VA disability recipients: Disabled veterans will also get a bump. The average VA disability check will go up about $1.. For example, if disability 1's rating is 40% and disability 2's is 20%, the combined rating is 52%. That figure gets rounded to the nearest 10%, making the disability rating 50%. Perhaps most revealing in terms of. You can have the newest furniture, tech, and appliances when you shop at Rent-A-Center on Walmart Dr. 115 and the Walmart-anchored retail area, the steady development of Frankie's Fun Park is the most visible coming attraction at the master-planned 500-acre Bryton Town Center on the southern edge of town. Đồng nghĩa với most students I think "Most students" is you are talking about general but if you say "most of students", you are talking about something specific. For example, "most of students at UCLA like music" most students live with their parents" |Most students = the majority of students Most of the students; most of our students = the majority of students in a specific place Fast Money. When it comes to quantifying objects in a sentence, you might have encountered phrases like “most of whom” or “most of which” before. In this article, we will be looking at the differences between “most of whom,” “most of who,” and “most of which” and when to use them.“Most of which” and “most of whom” are both correct but are used differently. “Most of which” is used to quantify things or animals “I have thirty cats, most of which are tabby”. “Most of whom” is used to quantify people “I have six friends, most of whom are male”.Both “whom” and “which” are objective pronouns and are used to replace the object of the sentence. We typically replace objective pronouns like “him” or “them” when we’re using “whom” or which.”For exampleI have six friends, most of them are have six friends, most of whom are replace the objective pronoun “them” in this sentence and use “whom” instead. Both forms are correct; it just depends if you want to use the formal tone “whom” or With “Most Of Whom”Let’s go over some examples of when we might use “most of whom” in a sentence. Remember, it’s a quantifying relative phrase, meaning that “most” of a select group of people are being referred to.“Most of whom” refers to a group of people that were previously mentioned in a sentence. It has to refer to people because “whom” is an objective pronoun used only for have ten colleagues in my office, most of whom are have six friends, most of whom are older than family has about thirty members, most of whom are living has a large population of people, most of whom are happy about their living thousand people rated and reviewed this product, most of whom were unhappy with you can see, we always use “most of whom” after a comma because it comes directly after a clause in the sentence. It’s used as a relative phrase to quantify the number of people from the previous statement.“Most” is a relative word. It can mean something as simple as three people while also meaning more than one million. It’s relative to the context of the sentence, which is why “most of whom” is seen as a relative have six friends, most of whom are million people live here, most of whom came from you can see from these sentences, the “most” number is different for each one. “Most” refers to the larger number of the group if it was divided. In the case of “six friends,” most could equal four or five but not all six. However, in the case of “thirty million,” “most” can suddenly mean twenty million or easiest way to define “most” as a relative term is to say “more than half but never all.”Is It “Most Of Who” Or “Most Of Whom”?Now let’s look at the difference between “most of who” and “most of whom.” We’ve yet to mention “most of who” in any situation, and that’s because it’s always wrong.“Most of who” is grammatically incorrect and should not be used. “Who” is a subjective pronoun, meaning we replace the subject of the sentence. After “most of,” we need an object for the sentence to make sense, which is why it doesn’t can make it simpler by replacing the word “who” with a subjective pronoun and seeing if a sentence still makes sense. We did the same with “whom” above, where we replaced it with “them” as an objective have many friends, most of who are have many friends, most of they are you can see, neither of these cases are correct. “They” is never the object of the sentence, which is why we can’t use it after “most of.” The same logic is therefore applied to using “who” in this You Use “Most Of Whom” Or “Most Of Them”?Generally, the phrases “most of whom” and “most of them” are interchangeable, and you can use whichever one you’re more comfortable or familiar with.“Most of whom” is the more formal choice. “Most of them” is still correct but is used in informal can decide whether you need to convey a formal or informal tone when you’re writing. That’s the only decider when it comes to whether you want to use “most of whom” or “most of them.” Either way, both are correct, and you can’t go wrong with either of “most of whom” is used more commonly in writing, while “most of them” is used more commonly in speaking. Speaking rules often don’t require to be followed as closely as writing rules, which is why we allow ourselves more casual tones when we For “Most Of Whom”Finding out about synonyms and alternatives is a great way to practice our language skills and further our vocabulary. We’ll run you through some of the best synonyms for “most of whom” so you can start using them yourself more of whomWe can use “some” as a relative word to quantify a number of people as well. “Some of whom” also refers to people, but it’s usually talking about a relative number that’s slightly less than “most.”Of whomIf you’re able to quantify the number exactly, simply saying “of whom” works well as a synonym. For example, “I have six friends, of whom four are male” is a great way to quantify it if you know the exact of whomWe use “many” and “most” similarly, showing that the two phrases are only thing that must stay the same for each synonym is the “whom” portion of it. “Whom” refers to people, meaning it must stay when we’re talking about Is The Meaning Of “Most Of Which”?“Most of which” is similar in almost every way to “most of whom.” The only difference you have to note is an obvious one, making it fairly easy to remember when to use which when the time comes.“Most of which” is used to quantify a number of objects that are things or animals. Basically, if we’re not talking about people, we can use “most of which” to describe the all there is to it. The meanings are identical otherwise. “Which” is another objective pronoun which we use to replace the word “them” in a sentence. “Most of which” is seen as the more formal and popular choice over “most of them.”How Do You Use “Most Of Which”?Examples go a long way in helping us with our understanding, so let’s do a few for “most of which” as we did above for “most of whom.”“Most of which” refers to a group of things or animals. If we’re not talking about people, then “which” is the correct objective pronoun to use in every have many possessions in my home, most of which are up for can’t count how many things I have in my collection, most of which I don’t even remember are many things you don’t know about this school, most of which damage the reputation if they get have six toothbrushes in that cup, most of which are old and counted thirteen chimpanzees, most of which were still asleep!As you can see, we can talk about either things or animals when we use “most of which.” That’s the only rule you have to You Start A Sentence With “Most Of Which”?Generally, when we use “most of which” and “most of whom,” we have to use them in the middle of the sentence. You might not be certain why we do this, so let’s can’t start a sentence with “most of which” because it needs to define and quantify something from the previous clause. For that reason, you can only state the clause, then put a comma after it, then follow it with “most of which.”If we don’t include a clause, then we can’t explain the quantity of what we’re talking of which you’ll never is considered to be an incomplete sentence that doesn’t make sense. There’s nothing we’re using to explain what we don’t are many explanations out there about space travel, most of which you’ll never is the correct way to use “most of For “Most Of Which”We’ll finish with some synonyms of “most of which” to see when we can use whichAgain, if we know the exact quantity, then we can start the clause with “of which.” “I saw six elephants, of which three had one tusk.”Some of which“Some” is a quantifiable word just like “most,” though it often refers to fewer may also likeSome Of Whom Or Some Of Who? Here’s The Correct Version +8 Examples“From Who” or “From Whom”? Correct Version With Examples“With Who” or “With Whom”? Correct Version With ExamplesMartin holds a Master’s degree in Finance and International Business. He has six years of experience in professional communication with clients, executives, and colleagues. Furthermore, he has teaching experience from Aarhus University. Martin has been featured as an expert in communication and teaching on Forbes and Shopify. Read more about Martin here. Anonymous Guest 1 In my TOEFL preparation book I have this example, There are six types of flamingos all, __________ have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward. On empty line I should choose one of this answers 1. of them 2. that 3. of which 4. they Ok, 2 and 4 I scratched right away, and I was thinking a little about whether "of them" or "of which" but "of them" sounded more familiar to me due to movies I guess so I choosed that BUT I saw later that its wrong. The right answer is "of which". Can someone explain me why is this? Would it be acceptable to use "all of them" in this exaple, if not where may I use it? Please dont use much grammer in explanation since I dont understand things that way, all my english is based on listening english/usa radio/movies and reading texts/books. Thanks 2 There are six types of flamingos all, __________ have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward. 1. of them 2. that 3. of which 4. they There's a comma , at the end of "all". That comma separates "all" from the phrase "of which". That is, "of which" is not part of "all". "of which" can be deleted without changing the meaning of the sentence ...flamingos all have long legs.... OK But, ...flamingos all, have long legs... Not Ok The comma separates the subject 'flamingos all' from the verb 'have'. And, ...flamingos all, of them have long legs... Not Ok. The phrase "all of them" is a set phrase. But the comma separates the head of the phrase "all" from its object "of them". So, let's move the comma ...flamingos, all of them, have long legs... OK No comma The difference between "of them" and "of which" is this "of which" functions as a modifier, whereas "of them" functions as an object. Objects are keepers don't separate them from their heads and don't delete them, whereas modifiers can be separated from the words they modify and they can be deleted, just like "of which" in our example "There are six types of flamingos all, of which have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward." All the best, Cas 3 Miks said In my TOEFL preparation book I have this example, There are six types of flamingos all, __________ have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward. On empty line I should choose one of this answers 1. of them 2. that 3. of which 4. they Ok, 2 and 4 I scratched right away, and I was thinking a little about whether "of them" or "of which" but "of them" sounded more familiar to me due to movies I guess so I choosed that BUT I saw later that its wrong. The right answer is "of which". Can someone explain me why is this? Would it be acceptable to use "all of them" in this exaple, if not where may I use it? Please dont use much grammer in explanation since I dont understand things that way, all my english is based on listening english/usa radio/movies and reading texts/books. Thanks The choice depends on punctuation. Unfortunately, the punctuation in the book is in error. There are two possibilities. 1. There are six types of flamingos, all of which have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward. 2. There are six types of flamingos; all of them have long legs, long necks, and beaks that curve sharply downward. The difference is that in the first sentence the second clause is a dependent clause modifying flamingos. The second sentence consists of two independent clauses. You could use a period full stop instead of a semicolon. The Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against Coinbase, alleging that the crypto exchange was operating as a broker, national securities exchange, and clearing agency without registering with the agency. The SEC further alleges that different crypto assets offered on Coinbase are unregistered securities, including popular cryptocurrencies such as Solana and the native tokens of Cardano and Polygon. The lawsuit comes a day after the SEC filed suit against Coinbase rival Binance and less than three months after Coinbase disclosed it had received a Wells Notice from the SEC—a document the agency uses to inform firms that they’re facing a legal investigation. “Coinbase’s alleged failures deprive investors of critical protections, including rulebooks that prevent fraud and manipulation, proper disclosure, safeguards against conflicts of interest, and routine inspection by the SEC,” Chair Gary Gensler said in a statement. In premarket trading, Coinbase shares had fallen 16%. The lawsuit delivers yet another blow to the reeling crypto industry, with Coinbase long presenting itself as a legally compliant player in the volatile sector. The suit was filed in the District Court for the Southern District of New York. “You simply can’t ignore the rules because you don’t like them or because you’d prefer different ones The consequences for the investing public are far too great,” Gurbir S. Grewal, director of the SEC’s division of enforcement, said in a statement. “The SEC’s reliance on an enforcement-only approach in the absence of clear rules for the digital asset industry is hurting America’s economic competitiveness and companies like Coinbase that have a demonstrated commitment to compliance,” said Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, in a statement shared with Fortune. “The solution is legislation that allows fair rules for the road to be developed transparently and applied equally, not litigation. In the meantime, we’ll continue to operate our business as usual.” According to the 101-page complaint, Coinbase has made billions of dollars by combining the traditional services of financial firms but without registering those offerings with the SEC, thus depriving investors of significant protections. Following a similar February enforcement action against competitor Kraken, the SEC also alleges Coinbase has offered unregistered securities through its staking-as-a-service program, where customers can earn profits through the proof-of-stake model of different blockchains, including Ethereum. When the SEC issued its Wells Notice in March, a person close to Coinbase, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told Fortune that the agency’s decision to go after the company was likely tied to its decision to expand offshore operations. In May, Coinbase launched its international exchange in Bermuda to offer derivatives products not available in the Coinbase has argued that its staking service is different from Kraken’s because it doesn’t hold customer assets, instead providing software that allows users to participate in staking activities. Since the SEC homed in on Coinbase, the exchange has pushed back against the agency, including a lawsuit against the SEC in April to compel the agency to engage in rulemaking. “We’re absolutely convinced the SEC is violating the law; we feel like we have no choice but to take them to court,” Coinbase’s Grewal told Fortune at the time. In its lawsuit on Tuesday, the SEC also expanded its list of tokens considered to be securities to include SOL, ADA, MATIC, FIL, SAND, AXS, CHZ, FLOW, ICP, NEAR, VGX, DASH, and NEXO. The SEC had previously included many popular cryptocurrencies in its suit against Binance on Monday, a move that will likely force brokers to rethink listing the tokens, which might depress their liquidity and price. The Alabama Securities Commission also announced on Tuesday that it had issued an order to Coinbase to demonstrate why its staking rewards program did not constitute an unregistered securities product. The action was advanced in a multistate task force with 10 other states, including California. Learn more about all things crypto with short, easy-to-read lesson cards. Click here for Fortune’s Crypto Crash Course. 1 Hello, Which of the forms is correct? Lots of women work in the office, many of them enjoy their work. or Lots of women work in the office, many of which enjoy their work. These sentences come from a handout of my grammar class, and I am still not sure which one of the forms is correct or whether they are interchangeable. Any help would be appreciated. 2 Nowadays, which is not used of people. In this case you need whom. 3 Ok, thanks! So it doesn't matter whether I use "many of them" or "many of whom"??? 4 The meaning is the same. The difference is that many of them enjoy their work is an independent clause and should be separated by a semi-colon; many of whom enjoy their work is a dependent clause and so the comma is enough. But this is a fine detail and other people may disagree. 5 It does matter. 'Many of them' creates a new sentence, and needs to be punctuated as a sentence. 'Many of whom' creates a new clause, and needs to be punctuated as a clause. "Who" is a subjective pronoun. It is used in the place of a subject in a sentence or phrase. For example "Who is coming to dinner?" "Who" is the subject. "Whom" is an objective pronoun. It is used in the place of an object in a sentence or phrase. For example, "With whom are you coming to dinner?" "Whom" is the object of the preposition, while "you" is the subject. Since "most of _____" is a prepositional phrase, the correct usage would be "most of whom." The phrase "most of who" should probably never be used. Another way to think about the difference between the subjective/objective pronouns is to revise the sentence to include a personal pronoun and see which form he/him or she/her or they/them fit. For example, take this sentence "I have twelve co-workers, most of whom are British." Could you re-write it as two sentences "I have twelve co-workers. Most of they are British?" Probably not! You would say "Most of them are British," because the "most of" prepositional construct takes an objective pronoun. I can't think of a case where it would take a subjective pronoun. As to whether you would use "most of whom" or "most of which," both "who" and "which" are relative pronouns. "Who" is used to refer to people, while "which" is used to refer to animals and things. For example, "I have twelve co-workers, most of whom are French, and I have twelve wine bottles, most of which are empty." Sometimes "which" might be used to refer to a group or crowd of people where individuality is less distinct. For example, "The crowd, most of which were local fans, cheered when the opposing pitcher got knocked unconscious by a line drive." I believe either "most of whom" or "most of which" could be used in that kind of sentence. ======

most of them và most of which